Dar Elzokora News

Covering surgical tools (dilators, retractors, etc.) with gold [specifically in the setting of penile implant surgery for ED].
Background: Penile prosthesis implantation carries a high risk of infection, and rigorous infection control measures are critical to reducing complications. Pros: Cons: Current evidence: Related (but indirect) evidence areas: Conclusion: References:

Against Routine Nasal Swabbing of the Surgical Team Before Penile Implant Surgery
Background: Why shouldn’t it be a routine practice? While nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), is a known risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI) in patients, extending routine nasal screening and decolonization protocols to the surgical team is not currently evidence-based — and comes with several drawbacks. Conclusion: References:

Use of Standard Field Surgical Telescopes During Penile Implant Surgery for ED
Background: Why Telescope Use Is Not Optimal in Routine Settings? Despite the potential benefits, standard field surgical telescopes present several practical and clinical limitations that make them suboptimal for routine use in most penile prosthesis surgeries: References:
Recent
- Covering surgical tools (dilators, retractors, etc.) with gold [specifically in the setting of penile implant surgery for ED].
- Against Routine Nasal Swabbing of the Surgical Team Before Penile Implant Surgery
- Use of Standard Field Surgical Telescopes During Penile Implant Surgery for ED
- Pulse Oximeter on the penis during penile implant surgery
- Laser Cutting in the Context of Penile Implants
- The Role of Overhead and Ear Covering in Infection Prevention During Penile Implant Surgery: A Critical Appraisal